Proceedings of the Second Summer School on Argumentation: Computational and Linguistic Perspectives (SSA'16)
نویسندگان
چکیده
My thesis focuses on using argumentation to model common-sense reasoning with preferences. I have equipped a structured argumentation formalism, Assumption-Based Argumentation, with a preference handling mechanism. I aim to advance the newly proposed formalism, called ABA+, present its place among other argumentation formalisms and discuss various properties of ABA+.
منابع مشابه
Sea Surfaces Scattering by Multi-Order Small-Slope Approximation: a Monte-Carlo and Analytical Comparison
L-band electromagnetic scattering from two-dimensional random rough sea surfaces are calculated by first- and second-order Small-Slope Approximation (SSA1, 2) methods. Both analytical and numerical computations are utilized to calculate incoherent normalized radar cross-section (NRCS) in mono- and bi-static cases. For evaluating inverse Fourier transform, inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) i...
متن کاملThe Relationship between Iranian EFL Learners’ Linguistic and Logical Intelligences and the Frequency of Fallacies and Evidence in their Argumentative Writing: A Gender-based Study
The learners’ ability to write a well-organized argumentative essay has gained prominence within the last decades. The multiple intelligences play a significant role in enhancing the precision of both language and thought during the writing process. The current study aimed at investigating the possible relationship between linguistic and logical intelligences and the frequency of informal falla...
متن کاملExploring the Relationship Between Phonological Awareness and Reading Ability: From Elementary Teachers’ Perspectives
The present study investigated the way elementary school teachers perceive the importance of phonological awareness in their classroom experiences. To achieve the aim, 75 elementary school teachers of both genders with diverse years of experience and qualifications from 25 elementary schools in Khorram Abad, Iran were selected. In order to obtain the data, the modified version of the Likert-typ...
متن کاملFrom Arguments in Natural Language to Argumentation Frameworks∗
For argumentation useful, the means must be found overcome the knowledge acquisition bottleneck between the source material and the translation into and out of an argumentation formalism. As source material is often expressed and understood in natural language, we should consider how to translate natural language arguments. The current state of the art in argumentation does not have any formal ...
متن کاملLinguistic Features of English Textese and Digitalk of Iranian EFL Students
This study aimed at investigating the English textese of Iranian EFL learners by scrutinizing the linguistic features through a qualitative design. In doing so, 700 messages were collected from 43 MA Iranian EFL learners of both genders. The features were categorized and analyzed calculating the frequency and percentage. The findings of the study showed that Iranian EFL students used different ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1608.02441 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016